Never knows what to eat

Zane v. Emily/Relationships/Filed Sep 25, 2026

Literally never has an idea of what to eat

Plaintiff

Zane@soul

She always buys everyone food except herself, but can never decide what she wants to eat. When an option comes up that she wants, she changes her mind 20 times before always just getting whatever is easiest.

Defense

Emily

You are so annoying, and im starving

Findings of the court

Zane alleges that Emily repeatedly cannot settle on food for herself, despite buying food for others. Emily answers that Zane is annoying and that she is starving.

The record contains no exhibits and is therefore thin.
Emily does not deny the alleged pattern of indecision.
Emily's statement that she is starving is consistent with the immediate consequence Zane describes: food has not been selected or obtained for her.

The court has reached a decision.

Verdict

Zane Prevails in the Matter of the Perpetually Pending Meal

The Court finds for Zane. His allegation is specific: Emily cycles through options and ultimately chooses whatever is easiest. Emily offers no competing account of the meal-selection process. Instead, she reports that Zane is annoying and that she remains hungry. The first assertion may be sincerely held but does not rebut the claim; the second modestly supports it. On this sparse record, the person unable to choose food has filed a response confirming that food remains unchosen.

Order

For the next meal, Emily must choose within one minute or accept the easiest available option without reopening deliberations.

Being starving is not a menu selection.

Community vote

Did the Court get it right?

The ruling above is the Court’s. This is only what the community thinks of it.

1 vote

Community Appeal

A free review is earned, not assumed.

A public ruling earns a free Appeals Court review when 25 members vote and 70% say the Court got it wrong.