Says she'll game with us, never does.

Zane alleges that Celina agrees to play games but habitually avoids doing so. The submitted exchanges instead show Celina gaming, asking about Zane’s availability, and encountering Zane’s own scheduling conflicts.

• Plaintiff Exhibit A shows Peaches stating that she is playing “wardogs,” while Soulraiser explains that household tasks and another person’s arrival may prevent him from joining.
• Defendant Exhibit A shows Peaches asking whether Soulraiser is on the computer; Soulraiser replies 37 minutes later that he had just awakened.
• The exhibits therefore support Celina’s position that schedules do not always align and materially weaken Zane’s categorical claim that she “never” games with the group.
• Plaintiff Exhibit B consists of Zane’s additional assertions about WoW Forever and work-life balance, but it does not establish that Celina agreed to a particular session and then abandoned it.

The record is thin but sufficient. Zane’s claim depends on a pattern of Celina agreeing to play and then evading the agreed session. No submitted exhibit documents such an agreement followed by an excuse. Plaintiff Exhibit A instead shows Celina already playing a game while Zane lists chores, a shower, and a likely cutoff imposed by the evening schedule. Defendant Exhibit A likewise shows Celina initiating contact and Zane being unavailable because he had just awakened. Work, sleep, chores, and household timing may be mortal enemies of multiplayer coordination, but this record does not make Celina solely responsible for their victory. Judgment is entered for Celina.

The receipts show less avoidance than two schedules repeatedly missing each other.