Thinks he knows computers

Zane challenges Parker’s computer knowledge, gaming expenditures, and gas-pump expertise. Parker denies the substance and characterizes the filing as preoccupation with his wallet. Neither side submitted exhibits.

• The record establishes only that Parker bought a PC and works on equipment; Parker’s own statement supplies those limited facts.
• Zane submitted no evidence showing that Parker misrepresented his computer knowledge, spent an absurd amount, or performs poorly at his work.
• Calling Parker a “gas pump nerd” proves the existence of an insult, not the underlying technical assessment.
• Parker’s remarks about what Zane can afford or troubleshoot are likewise unsupported, but they do not establish Zane’s claims.

The plaintiff bears the burden of supporting the complaint with something beyond competitive disdain. Zane offers three conclusions: Parker does not understand computers, overspends on gaming, and performs poorly on gas-pump equipment. The record contains no prices, technical errors, repair outcomes, or other evidence supporting any of them. Parker’s response adds its own unproven barbs, but a sharp reply does not prove the original allegations. On this exceptionally lean record, the Court cannot convert hardware envy and occupational heckling into factual findings. Judgment is entered for Parker.

A “gas pump nerd” is an insult, not an expert report.